Teamwork.com vs Airtable.
Different strengths. Different costs. Here’s what to weigh before you choose.
Compare the plans as well as the brands. These prices may have different billing commitments and capacity limits; they are not equivalent quotes.
| What matters | Teamwork.com | Airtable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Client-project management platform for small service teams, with task planning, time logging and client-organized work. | Configurable database and work-management platform for teams organizing projects, shared business records and repeatable workflows. |
| Listed plan | Free | Team |
| Base price | $0 / mo | $24 / seat / mo |
| Pricing conditions | Free supports up to five users and five active projects, 100MB storage and 100 automation actions/month. It excludes client-user seats and invoicing. Paid Basics starts at USD9.99/user/month annually with a three-user minimum; the paid seat minimum is not modeled here. | USD per billable collaborator/month for one workspace, billed monthly; annual billing is USD20 per collaborator/month. On Team, Commenter-or-higher access is billable. Additional paid workspaces are billed separately; records, storage, API calls and automation usage have limits. |
| Documented capabilities | projects, automation | projects, forms, automation, collaboration |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits | Yes, with limits |
| Trial | 14 days for paid plans. | 14-day Team trial for the first workspace; some features are excluded. |
| Integrations | Not yet verified | Not yet verified |
| Benefits (editorial) | Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost. Organizing work by client is available on the free tier. | Custom records, forms and interfaces can support several related business workflows. Read-only access and public form submissions do not require paid collaborator seats. |
| Limitations | Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity. Client-user access and invoices are excluded from Free; invoicing requires a higher paid tier. | Commenter access is billable on Team, so review collaborator permissions before budgeting. Limits apply per base or workspace; upgrading does not make records and automation usage unlimited. |
| Typical fit (editorial) | Marketing agency, Professional services | Marketing agency, Professional services, Creator & newsletter, E-commerce |
| AI, support & ease of use | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. |
| Evidence | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → |
| Your next step | Visit Teamwork.comStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. | Visit AirtableStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. |
Use-case recommendations
Consider Teamwork.com when…
Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost.
Check first: Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity.
Consider Airtable when…
Custom records, forms and interfaces can support several related business workflows.
Check first: Commenter access is billable on Team, so review collaborator permissions before budgeting.
Make the decision on your terms
Test your real workflow, calculate the full team and usage cost, and confirm export options before migrating. A higher advertised feature count does not necessarily create a better fit.
LESS RESEARCH. BETTER DECISIONS.Your business is unique.
Build my software stack Your business is unique.
Your software stack should be too.
Get a practical shortlist based on what you actually need.