Teamwork.com vs Asana.
Different strengths. Different costs. Here’s what to weigh before you choose.
Compare the plans as well as the brands. These prices may have different billing commitments and capacity limits; they are not equivalent quotes.
| What matters | Teamwork.com | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Client-project management platform for small service teams, with task planning, time logging and client-organized work. | Project coordination for small teams, agencies and cross-functional organizations, using shared tasks, multiple project views and workflow rules. |
| Listed plan | Free | Starter |
| Base price | $0 / mo | Contact vendor |
| Pricing conditions | Free supports up to five users and five active projects, 100MB storage and 100 automation actions/month. It excludes client-user seats and invoicing. Paid Basics starts at USD9.99/user/month annually with a three-user minimum; the paid seat minimum is not modeled here. | Starter lists USD 10.99/user/month annually or USD 13.49 monthly. Minimum two seats and larger seat increments apply; Stackwise does not model seat bundles. Personal is free for two users. Portfolio management and native time tracking require Advanced; AI request allowances apply. |
| Documented capabilities | projects, automation | projects, automation, forms, collaboration |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits | Yes, with limits |
| Trial | 14 days for paid plans. | Starter and Advanced trial offered; duration not verified. |
| Integrations | Not yet verified | Not yet verified |
| Benefits (editorial) | Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost. Organizing work by client is available on the free tier. | Combines project views with structured work intake. Free guests can support external collaboration on paid plans. |
| Limitations | Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity. Client-user access and invoices are excluded from Free; invoicing requires a higher paid tier. | Seat increments complicate precise small-team cost estimates. Portfolio and capacity features are above Starter. |
| Typical fit (editorial) | Marketing agency, Professional services | Marketing agency, Professional services |
| AI, support & ease of use | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. |
| Evidence | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → | Sources checked 2026-10-09 → |
| Your next step | Visit Teamwork.comStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. | Visit AsanaStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. |
Use-case recommendations
Consider Teamwork.com when…
Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost.
Check first: Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity.
Consider Asana when…
Combines project views with structured work intake.
Check first: Seat increments complicate precise small-team cost estimates.
Make the decision on your terms
Test your real workflow, calculate the full team and usage cost, and confirm export options before migrating. A higher advertised feature count does not necessarily create a better fit.
LESS RESEARCH. BETTER DECISIONS.Your business is unique.
Build my software stack Your business is unique.
Your software stack should be too.
Get a practical shortlist based on what you actually need.