Teamwork.com vs monday.com.
Different strengths. Different costs. Here’s what to weigh before you choose.
Compare the plans as well as the brands. These prices may have different billing commitments and capacity limits; they are not equivalent quotes.
| What matters | Teamwork.com | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Client-project management platform for small service teams, with task planning, time logging and client-organized work. | Visual work platform for organizing tasks, project boards and shared documents; the listed Free plan suits solo users or two-person teams. |
| Listed plan | Free | Free — work management |
| Base price | $0 / mo | $0 / mo |
| Pricing conditions | Free supports up to five users and five active projects, 100MB storage and 100 automation actions/month. It excludes client-user seats and invoicing. Paid Basics starts at USD9.99/user/month annually with a three-user minimum; the paid seat minimum is not modeled here. | Free plan supports two users, three boards, three docs and 200 initial items across the account. No automations, integrations, guests or viewers. Paid plans are separate; displayed paid prices vary by billing region and are not modeled here. |
| Documented capabilities | projects, automation | projects, collaboration, forms |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits | Yes, with limits |
| Trial | 14 days for paid plans. | 14-day trial of advanced features is available. |
| Integrations | Not yet verified | Not yet verified |
| Benefits (editorial) | Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost. Organizing work by client is available on the free tier. | Two collaborators can use task boards and shared documents without a subscription. The forms view can collect information directly into project boards. |
| Limitations | Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity. Client-user access and invoices are excluded from Free; invoicing requires a higher paid tier. | Three boards and 200 initial items constrain the amount of active work. External guests, automations and integrations require a paid plan. |
| Typical fit (editorial) | Marketing agency, Professional services | Marketing agency, Professional services, Creator & newsletter, Local business |
| AI, support & ease of use | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. |
| Evidence | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → |
| Your next step | Visit Teamwork.comStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. | Visit monday.comStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. |
Use-case recommendations
Consider Teamwork.com when…
Small teams can combine project views and time logging without subscription cost.
Check first: Five active projects and 100MB storage impose a low starting capacity.
Consider monday.com when…
Two collaborators can use task boards and shared documents without a subscription.
Check first: Three boards and 200 initial items constrain the amount of active work.
Make the decision on your terms
Test your real workflow, calculate the full team and usage cost, and confirm export options before migrating. A higher advertised feature count does not necessarily create a better fit.
LESS RESEARCH. BETTER DECISIONS.Your business is unique.
Build my software stack Your business is unique.
Your software stack should be too.
Get a practical shortlist based on what you actually need.