monday.com vs Asana.
Different strengths. Different costs. Here’s what to weigh before you choose.
Compare the plans as well as the brands. These prices may have different billing commitments and capacity limits; they are not equivalent quotes.
| What matters | monday.com | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Visual work platform for organizing tasks, project boards and shared documents; the listed Free plan suits solo users or two-person teams. | Project coordination for small teams, agencies and cross-functional organizations, using shared tasks, multiple project views and workflow rules. |
| Listed plan | Free — work management | Starter |
| Base price | $0 / mo | Contact vendor |
| Pricing conditions | Free plan supports two users, three boards, three docs and 200 initial items across the account. No automations, integrations, guests or viewers. Paid plans are separate; displayed paid prices vary by billing region and are not modeled here. | Starter lists USD 10.99/user/month annually or USD 13.49 monthly. Minimum two seats and larger seat increments apply; Stackwise does not model seat bundles. Personal is free for two users. Portfolio management and native time tracking require Advanced; AI request allowances apply. |
| Documented capabilities | projects, collaboration, forms | projects, automation, forms, collaboration |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits | Yes, with limits |
| Trial | 14-day trial of advanced features is available. | Starter and Advanced trial offered; duration not verified. |
| Integrations | Not yet verified | Not yet verified |
| Benefits (editorial) | Two collaborators can use task boards and shared documents without a subscription. The forms view can collect information directly into project boards. | Combines project views with structured work intake. Free guests can support external collaboration on paid plans. |
| Limitations | Three boards and 200 initial items constrain the amount of active work. External guests, automations and integrations require a paid plan. | Seat increments complicate precise small-team cost estimates. Portfolio and capacity features are above Starter. |
| Typical fit (editorial) | Marketing agency, Professional services, Creator & newsletter, Local business | Marketing agency, Professional services |
| AI, support & ease of use | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. | Confirm plan-specific AI limits and support. Ease of use has not been independently tested. |
| Evidence | Sources checked 2026-10-10 → | Sources checked 2026-10-09 → |
| Your next step | Visit monday.comStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. | Visit AsanaStandard provider link; no commission currently earned. |
Use-case recommendations
Consider monday.com when…
Two collaborators can use task boards and shared documents without a subscription.
Check first: Three boards and 200 initial items constrain the amount of active work.
Consider Asana when…
Combines project views with structured work intake.
Check first: Seat increments complicate precise small-team cost estimates.
Make the decision on your terms
Test your real workflow, calculate the full team and usage cost, and confirm export options before migrating. A higher advertised feature count does not necessarily create a better fit.
LESS RESEARCH. BETTER DECISIONS.Your business is unique.
Build my software stack Your business is unique.
Your software stack should be too.
Get a practical shortlist based on what you actually need.